The viral success of the Velvet Sundown, an AI-generated band that garnered over a million streams on Spotify, has raised significant red flags for music insiders, who are now demanding clear warnings for listeners. This incident has put a harsh spotlight on the burgeoning field of AI-created music and the lack of regulatory oversight.
Initially presented as a conventional country-folk act, the Velvet Sundown’s true nature as an AI creation, built with the Suno platform, was eventually exposed. The band’s subsequent admission of being Not quite human. Not quite machine has fueled a growing movement for greater transparency from streaming services.
Music industry luminaries are leading the charge for change. Roberto Neri of the Ivors Academy expresses alarm about AI-generated bands like Velvet Sundown that are reaching big audiences without involving human creators, citing concerns around transparency and consent. Sophie Jones of the BPI is advocating for the UK government to mandate new transparency obligations for AI companies and introduce clear labeling for AI-generated content.
The implications extend beyond simple identification; there are deep concerns about copyright infringement and fair compensation for artists whose work might be unknowingly used to train these AI models. The situation is seen as a crucial test for the music industry to establish ethical guidelines that protect human artistry while embracing technological advancements, ensuring that consumers are well-informed about the origins of the music they consume.
Is Your Music AI? The Velvet Sundown Case Raises Red Flags
55